Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with "pit crew" resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR.

OBJECTIVE: To compare OHCA outcomes in patients managed with mechanical versus manual CPR in an EMS system with a "pit crew" approach to resuscitation and a scripted sequence for the initiation of mechanical CPR. METHODS: Through a year-long quality improvement effort we standardized the initial resuscitative efforts for OHCA, prioritizing a "pit crew" approach to high quality manual CPR, early defibrillation and basic airway management ahead of a scripted sequence for initiating mechanical CPR. We then analyzed outcomes for adult, non-traumatic OHCA attended in the following year (2016). We used a propensity score matched analysis to compare ROSC, survival to discharge, and neurologic status among patients managed with manual versus mechanical CPR while controlling for patient demographics and arrest characteristics. RESULTS: Of 444 eligible OHCAs, 217 received manual and 227 received mechanical CPR. Crude ROSC (39.2% vs. 29.1%) and survival to discharge (13.8% vs. 5.7%) were higher with manual CPR. In the propensity matched analysis (n = 176 manual CPR; 176 mechanical CPR), both ROSC (38.6% vs. 28.4%; difference: 10.2%; CI: 0.4% to 20.0%) and survival to discharge (13.6% vs. 6.8%; difference: 6.8%; CI: 0.5% to 13.3%) remained significantly higher for patients receiving manual CPR. CONCLUSIONS: In this EMS system with a standardized, "pit crew" approach to OHCA that prioritized initial high-quality initial resuscitative efforts and scripted the sequence for initiating mechanical CPR, use of mechanical CPR was associated with decreased ROSC and decreased survival to discharge.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Systems of Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

The American Heart Association previously recommended implementation of cardiac resuscitation systems of care that consist of interconnected community, emergency medical services, and hospital efforts to measure and improve the process of care and outcome for patients with cardiac arrest. In addition, the American Heart Association proposed a national process to develop and implement evidence-based guidelines for cardiac resuscitation systems of care. Significant experience has been gained with implementing these systems, and new evidence has accumulated. This update describes recent advances in the science of cardiac resuscitation systems and evidence of their effectiveness, as well as recent progress in dissemination and implementation throughout the United States. Emphasis is placed on evidence published since the original recommendations (ie, including and since 2010).

TAKE10: A community approach to teaching compression-only CPR to high-risk zip codes.

OBJECTIVE: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has the ability to improve patient survival. However, the rates at which CPR occurs are suboptimal. We hypothesized that targeted CPR training in neighborhoods with low bystander CPR and high incidence of cardiac arrests would increase the incidence of bystander CPR for adult OHCA. METHODS: This study is a descriptive observation and analysis of the TAKE 10 program, which recruited City of Austin and Travis County residents to teach fellow community members compression-only CPR. Twelve zip codes in Austin and Travis County were identified as "high-risk," based on low bystander CPR rates and high incidences of cardiac arrest. Data was collected on bystander CPR for OHCA over the study period of July 2008 to September 2013. Incidence of cardiac arrest and bystander CPR were calculated yearly and overall. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 11,242 community members completed compression-only CPR training. While there was no significant difference in the number of individuals trained in high-risk zip codes compared to the other zip codes (High-Risk [n±sd] 263±235; General 212±193; p-value 0.46), the amount of people trained in the high-risk zip codes did trend upwards over the study period. Additionally, there was an increase in percent of bystander CPR per eligible cardiac arrest in the high-risk zip codes (2009: [n±sd] 0.28±0.34 to 2013: 0.39±0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted compression-only CPR training in high-risk neighborhoods may be associated with increased bystander CPR rates over time.

Derivation and initial application of a standard population for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (SPOHCA).

AIM: While adjusting data for age, sex, race and/or socio-economic status is well established in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) research, there are shortcomings to reporting and comparing population-based OHCA outcomes. The purpose of this study was to derive a case-based standard population specific to EMS treated adult OHCA (SPOHCA) in the U.S., and demonstrate its application. METHODS: The proposed SPOHCA was developed from three sources of multi-site OHCA data: the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES); the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS); and a published report from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). OHCA data from a single EMS system were then used to demonstrate the application of SPOHCA. We report raw survival, population-based survival adjusted to the U.S. population, and the new SPOHCA-adjusted survival. RESULTS: Observed raw survival was 12.3%. Adjustment to the demographic make-up of the adult U.S. population produced an adjusted incidence of 94.2 OHCA per 100,000 p-y, with a survival rate of 9.8 per 100,000 p-y. Using the proposed SPOHCA to adjust survival data produced an adjusted survival rate of 12.4%. CONCLUSION: A case-based standard population provides for more practical interpretation of reported OHCA outcomes. We encourage a more widespread effort involving multiple stakeholders to further explore the effects of adjusting OHCA outcomes using the proposed SPOHCA instead of population-based demographics.

Emergency medical services management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States--a report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program.

OBJECTIVE: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Emergency medical services (EMS) agencies play a critical role in its initial identification and treatment. We conducted this study to assess EMS management of STEMI care in the United States. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was administered to leaders of EMS agencies to define the elements of STEMI care related to 4 core measures: (1) electrocardiogram (ECG) capability at the scene, (2) destination protocols, (3) catheterization laboratory activation before hospital arrival, and (4) 12-lead ECG quality review. Geographic areas were grouped into large metropolitan, small metropolitan, micropolitan, and noncore (or rural) by using Urban Influence Codes, with a stratified analysis. RESULTS: Data were included based on responses from 5296 EMS agencies (36% of those in the United States) serving 91% of the US population, with at least 1 valid response from each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Approximately 63% of agencies obtained ECGs at the scene using providers trained in ECG acquisition and interpretation. A total of 46% of EMS systems used protocols to determine hospital destination, cardiac catheterization laboratory activation, and communications with the receiving hospital. More than 75% of EMS systems used their own agency funds to purchase equipment, train personnel, and provide administrative oversight. A total of 49% of agencies have quality review programs in place. In general, EMS systems covering higher population densities had easier access to resources needed to maintain STEMI systems of care. Emergency medical services systems that have adopted all 4 core elements cover 14% of the US population. CONCLUSIONS: There are large differences in EMS systems of STEMI care in the United States. Most EMS agencies have implemented at least 1 of the 4 core elements of STEMI care, with many having implemented multiple elements.

A tale of two cities: the role of neighborhood socioeconomic status in spatial clustering of bystander CPR in Austin and Houston.

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence to suggest significant spatial variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) rates, geographic information systems (GIS) and spatial analysis have not been widely used to understand the reasons behind this variation. This study employs spatial statistics to identify the location and extent of clusters of bystander CPR in Houston and Travis County, TX. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival for two U.S. sites - Austin-Travis County EMS and the Houston Fire Department - between October 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between income and racial/ethnic composition of a neighborhood and BCPR for OHCA and to adjust expected counts of BCPR for spatial cluster analysis. The spatial scan statistic was used to find the geographic extent of clusters of high and low BCPR. RESULTS: Results indicate spatial clusters of lower than expected BCPR rates in Houston. Compared to BCPR rates in the rest of the community, there was a circular area of 4.2km radius where BCPR rates were lower than expected (RR=0.62; p<0.0001 and RR=0.55; p=0.037) which persist when adjusted for individual-level patient characteristics (RR=0.34; p=0.027) and neighborhood-level race (RR=0.34; p=0.034) and household income (RR=0.34; p=0.046). We also find a spatial cluster of higher than expected BCPR in Austin. Compared to the rest of the community, there was a 23.8km radius area where BCPR rates were higher than expected (RR=1.75; p=0.07) which disappears after controlling for individual-level characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A geographically targeted CPR training strategy which is tailored to individual and neighborhood population characteristics may be effective in reducing existing disparities in the provision of bystander CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system.

BACKGROUND: Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a key determinant of outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Recent evidence shows manual chest compressions are typically too shallow, interruptions are frequent and prolonged, and incomplete release between compressions is common. Mechanical chest compression systems have been developed as adjuncts for CPR but interruption of CPR during their use is not well documented. AIM: Analyze interruptions of CPR during application and use of the LUCAS™ chest compression system. METHODS: 54 LUCAS 1 devices operated on compressed air, deployed in 3 major US emergency medical services systems, were used to treat patients with OHCA. Electrocardiogram and transthoracic impedance data from defibrillator/monitors were analyzed to evaluate timing of CPR. Separately, providers estimated their CPR interruption time during application of LUCAS, for comparison to measured application time. RESULTS: In the 32 cases analyzed, compressions were paused a median of 32.5s (IQR 25-61) to apply LUCAS. Providers' estimates correlated poorly with measured pause length; pauses were often more than twice as long as estimated. The average device compression rate was 104/min (SD 4) and the average compression fraction (percent of time compressions were occurring) during mechanical CPR was 0.88 (SD 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions in chest compressions to apply LUCAS can be <20s but are often much longer, and users do not perceive pause time accurately. Therefore, we recommend better training on application technique, and implementation of systems using impedance data to give users objective feedback on their mechanical chest compression device use.

Take Heart America: A comprehensive, community-wide, systems-based approach to the treatment of cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: To determine out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates before and after implementation of the Take Heart America program (a community-based initiative that sequentially deployed all of the most highly recommended 2005 American Heart Association resuscitation guidelines in an effort to increase out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival). PATIENTS: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Anoka County, MN, and greater St. Cloud, MN, from November 2005 to June 2009. INTERVENTIONS: Two sites in Minnesota with a combined population of 439,692 people (greater St. Cloud and Anoka County) implemented: 1) widespread cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills training in schools and businesses; 2) retraining of all emergency medical services personnel in methods to enhance circulation, including minimizing cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruptions, performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and after single-shock defibrillation, and use of an impedance threshold device; 3) additional deployment of automated external defibrillators in schools and public places; and 4) protocols for transport to and treatment by cardiac arrest centers for therapeutic hypothermia, coronary artery evaluation and treatment, and electrophysiological evaluation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: More than 28,000 people were trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use in the two sites. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates increased from 20% to 29% (p = .086, odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 0.96-2.89). Three cardiac arrest centers were established, and hypothermia therapy for admitted out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims increased from 0% to 45%. Survival to hospital discharge for all patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in these two sites improved from 8.5% (nine of 106, historical control) to 19% (48 of 247, intervention phase) (p = .011, odds ratio 2.60, confidence interval 1.19-6.26). A financial analysis revealed that the cardiac arrest centers concept was financially feasible, despite the costs associated with high-quality postresuscitation care. CONCLUSIONS: The Take Heart America program doubled cardiac arrest survival when compared with historical controls. Study of the feasibility of generalizing this approach to larger cities, states, and regions is underway.

Combined interventions may improve success when treating sudden cardiac arrest.

Recently, emphasis has been placed on the simultaneous implementation of resuscitation interventions currently recommended within the 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC). The rate of successful outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains relatively low in most U.S. communities. Accurate measures of these rates are difficult to determine because of ineffective reporting mechanisms. In many cases of acute myocardial infarction, the initial presentation of symptoms is quickly followed by sudden death. Little information exists regarding the system-of-care components most likely to result in successful outcomes. Inconsistent application of these components may be responsible in part for the variability of survival rates among communities. We present a case of acute myocardial infarction followed by sudden cardiac arrest benefiting from the application of coordinated, community-based systems of care.